Skip to content
iBuildMVPs

Bobby Cavezza · Product-minded engineer

I help founders turn uncertain product ideas into software people can actually use.

Senior product and engineering judgment for early-stage teams that need to define the right thing, ship a credible first version, or rescue a build that has lost direction.

Two-week Product Definition Sprint · $2,000

Bobby Cavezza
Clear thinking before expensive code.
Software engineering manager, founder, and hands-on builder.
Product definitionScope the smallest version worth building
Hands-on engineeringPrototype, architecture, and implementation
Founder-level judgmentDirect answers without agency theater
01 · Fit

The work is most valuable when the product is still ambiguous.

Good reasons to call

  • You have a real product idea, but the first version is not clear.
  • Your current prototype works poorly or proves the wrong thing.
  • You need senior technical judgment without hiring a full team.
  • You want to pressure-test scope before committing more money.

Probably not a fit

  • You need a large agency, a fixed feature factory, or staff augmentation.
  • The project has no owner who can make product decisions.
  • You want a complete custom application built for $2,000.
  • You need activity more than an honest answer.
02 · Owned products

I still build products, not just recommendations.

01
Founder · Product · Engineering

Teemzo

An owned product that reflects how I approach narrow customer problems: learn the workflow, find the leverage point, and build the smallest useful system around it.

Visit Teemzo →
02
Founder · Product · Engineering

DeltaRival

An owned product and ongoing proving ground for product strategy, application architecture, automation, and the unglamorous work required to keep software useful.

Visit DeltaRival →
03 · Starting point

A small paid engagement before a large commitment.

$2k 10 focused hours over two weeks

Product Definition Sprint

We use the time to remove the most expensive uncertainty around the product. The result is a concrete recommendation for what to build, what to defer, and what should happen next.

  • Two working sessions with the people who own the problem
  • Review of the idea, prototype, existing code, or current workflow
  • Written scope for the smallest credible first version
  • Technical approach, primary risks, and rough build range
  • A direct go, revise, or stop recommendation

This is a definition engagement, not a $2,000 promise to build the whole product. Follow-on implementation is separate and typically billed at $200/hour.

Frame the problem

Get the real business constraint, customer, and decision on the table.

Reduce the scope

Separate the smallest proof from the features that can wait.

Choose the next move

Leave with a plan you can build with me, hand to another engineer, or decide not to pursue.

04 · Bobby

One accountable person, not a mystery team.

I’m Bobby Cavezza, a software engineering manager and startup founder. I work across product definition, architecture, and hands-on implementation, which means the recommendation and the code do not come from separate rooms.

I’m useful when a founder needs someone who can challenge the premise, make the tradeoffs explicit, and still get into the details.

More about me at BobbyCavezza.com →

Cover of The Self-Taught Developer's Guide to Big O Notation
05 · New book

The Self-Taught Developer’s Guide to Big O Notation

A practical guide to the performance ideas that often get buried under math-heavy explanations—written for working developers who learned by building.

Available in paperback and Kindle

06 · Start here

Tell me what you are trying to build—and what is currently unclear.

A useful first note includes the customer, the problem, what exists today, and the decision you need to make. If the sprint is not the right next step, I will say so.

Name